Tuesday, August 4, 2009

Digital Contamination

Using your mobile on a plane may not be an issue in the near future as more airlines allow its passengers to make and receive calls during flights. However, the opposite might also be true when it comes to having your mobile phone switched on during search warrants or incident responses.

Almost all latest mobile phone models now come with Wi-Fi and/or Bluethooth capabilities. These phones are often used by incident responders and digital forensic specialists, who attend search warrants or scenes of crime. Given the fact that it is almost impossible to find a laptop or desktop computer used by suspects without some kind of wireless network device built in or connected to it, the potential for accidental digital contamination should not be underestimated. Your Wi-FI or Bluetooth enabled phone could potentially be detected by the suspect's laptop and later you may find your mobile device network name (or even worse - your own name) logged by the suspect's machine.

Furthermore, Google Sync, SyncJe, the Missing Sync and many other mobile phone applications are capable of wirelessly synchronising iPhone, BlackBerry, Windows Mobile and some Nokia and Ericson standard phones with the base computer. The items that normally got synchronised are contacts, calendars, email account settings, webpage bookmarks, notes, music and photos. Theoretically, depending on set preferences these items may get automatically synced between your mobile device and the suspect's computer "if care is not taken to ensure that the investigator's devices have had their wireless functions disabled prior to approaching a suspect's device..." [Angus M. Marshall]

I am just wondering how many organisations/practitioners have implemented safeguards/policies that are dealing with the issue. I am adding a poll to my blog that will run for a couple of weeks, so please take you time to answer the question.

Does your organisation have a policy mandating wireless devices off during forensic examination?

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Very good point, I would not like to estimate how many Forensic Investigators who may not be aware of this.